Font rendering Mac OS X vs Windows vs Linux
By Osma on Tuesday 12 June 2007, 18:19 - Permalink
A topic which I've run tests with before (long time before), apparently has come back with Apple's Safari for Windows release. Jeff Atwood finds Mac OS X fonts wonky - well, they're certainly soft. Apple has never been too keen on strong hinting, perhaps because it messes inter-glyph metrics in favor of contrast. Windows is wonky in its own way - ClearType has good contrast, but letter spacing is sometimes a bit annoying.
Just for kicks, here's what Fedora 7 with FreeType autohinting and subpixel rendering (equivalent of ClearType) looks like. This is just one of the modes, but the one I personally prefer:

Comparing at 200% rendering to Jeff's examples; Safari/Windows, IE7/Windows, and Firefox/Fedora



I guess it's up to everyone's preferences, but I think Fedora wins this one. Spacing isn't perfect here either (in particular "b est" looks a bit ugly), but overall, contrast is excellent and paragraph spacing is very close to what it would be without hinting.
Comments
Better than Windows. The font stroke width is retained in the horizontals and verticals. Is this Arial font, or a near substitute?