Earlier today Nokia announced their first handset based on what is likely to
be their mobile operating system of the future - the Nokia N900 Maemo. I didn't think I would
bother to pay attention, but somehow, I ended up doing so anyway, and this post
is a result of that time spent thinking about it. I like quite a few things
about it, but can't avoid being deeply bothered by other aspects. I hope by
writing this I can make some small contribution to its future.
Why do I care? After the frustrations and disappointments with Nokia devices
in the past years, I've tried not to. However, they're impossible to ignore in
Finland, I have family reasons to hope this road leads to something good, and
it's an attempt to make an open platform -- and I care about open platforms.
Why do I feel qualified to comment? Well, because this is not really about
devices, it's about software. And software is what I've always done, and
managing software organizations is what I think about daily.
There's lot to like about the N900. I haven't seen, let alone played with
one, but as far as the specs go, it's a pretty nice set of hardware.
Same performance as the iPhone 3GS (which also makes it faster than any Android
device announced), 3D acceleration, lots of storage (and a memory card slot),
and, as a welcome change from many other Nokia devices, completely standard
connectors (3.5mm audio, micro-USB tethering and battery charger). On the
hardware side, the only thing not to like about it is the lack of a
finger-usable, multi-touch display. This device, like all the other Nokia
devices before it, require a stylus or at least long fingernails. It makes up
for that by being really high resolution.
It's also based on an open source, Linux-based operating system Nokia has
been developing for several years with community
participation, Maemo. This makes it more attractive to me on a personal
level than iPhone (which is
way too closely guarded and controlled by Apple), Palm WebOS (open, but
little track record), or even Android (open, but built out of pieces which have
far less common with normal Linux than Maemo). It should be fairly clear that
all four mentioned are way ahead of things like Symbian S60, which clearly
needs to be taken behind the shed and put out of its misery, not matter what
Nokia's representatives say about it official capacity.
On a more professional level, the inclusion of Flash 9.4 in the platform is
a big deal. I'm anxious to get hold of one and see how much work it is to make
Habbo work on it. This could be the first handset capable of technically
running it (enough performance, enough resolution, good enough software),
though obviously tuning our service to a mobile device would still need work on
UI and other pieces.
However, like I wrote above, there's also plenty that bothers me. First of
all, unlike most people probably realize, this is actually the 4th Maemo device
in about as many years that Nokia releases. First was the Nokia 770 Internet
Tablet, essentially an early adopter test device. Then came N800 -- running
an updated OS which required applications to be ported to it, but which never
was officially released for the 770 (putting the early adopter developers in a
rather awkward position). Less than a year later N810 added a
physical keyboard and an OS upgrade (which fortunately could be installed, with
some difficulty, on the N800). That was quite a long time ago, though.
In the meantime, Maemo has been completely reinvented. The original UI
toolkit has been switched to QT, which Nokia
bought in the meantime, and all of the (rather limited quantity) applications
require significant rework to be compatible with the OS release on the N900.
The public reasoning for this compatibility break has been pretty weak -- "to
ensure compatibility with S60", which also is moving on to QT
framework. Why is this weak? Well, because the transition over on the S60 side
also requires all of the (somewhat more numerous) applications developed for
that platform to be significantly reworked. In other words, Nokia broke
compatibility on both its old smartphone platform and the new platform at the
same time, and offered little transitionary compatibility layers to either
side. Not for the first time, either. S60 applications have been broken
between upgrades several times before, too.
This track record is highly worrying. Despite their years of practice and
ambitions to have a lively third party mobile applications market, Nokia has
clearly not grasped the importance of a stable platform to the developers they
mean to attract. This lack of understanding of one of the most basic
requirements is enough to counter pretty much everything I wrote about Maemo
versus its closest competitions a few chapters earlier.
Contrast the above to iPhone OS 2.0 to 3.0 transition. Sure, a few things
did change. However, developers were given months of notice ahead of time, and
the changes, apart from added functionality, were all pretty minor. Of course,
Apple has a long history of making major upgrades while retaining forwards
compatibility, with the Mac OS 68k to PowerPC, then to OS X, then to Intel CPU
transitions.
It's also taken a LONG time for this device to be announced. I don't know,
but I get the feeling it's something like a year late. The break in launch
schedule between N810 and N900, the amount of changes in the Maemo platform,
and the design of the device compared to for instance the N97 all scream "last
year" to me. Besides,
everyone knew this was coming ages ago. In the time between the launches of
N810 and N900, Apple has managed to update the iPhone twice. This lack of
predictability in the release cycle doesn't bode well for the next device in
the line.
There is nothing more important for progress in software development than
cycle time. The only cost-effective, productive way of making software today is
to get feedback on it often, and the longer it stays unreleased, the more the
feedback is late when it comes. This seems to be another area where Nokia has
not been able to shake off their "we make hardware" mentality. Unline hardware,
software can be updated with no extra cost. That's an advantage nearly everyone
else has learned to make use of, and Nokia, if they truly desire to become a
software and services powerhouse, has to finally take to heart.
N900 is not an "iPhone killer". I don't think it's meant to be. When its
development started, it's unlikely the iPhone had even been announced. However,
it's the best chance for Nokia to ever develop a device better than an iPhone.
I hope they will - the world needs competition, and I would like to see Nokia
be part in that. However, at this rate they will never catch up - Apple will
have released two more major updates before the next Maemo device unless Nokia
gets their act together.
I'm still hoping.
